Customize your website

  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (0)

No need to know




Published on August 30, 2010
Published on August 30, 2010
Brodie Thomas  RSS Feed

Just over a week ago, news broke that Samantha Goodyear had been found safe and sound after being gone for a week. Her parents launched a frantic search when their daughter neglected to call them and did not return to her St. John’s apartment.

Topics :
New Brunswick

 

With a missing persons case already in the news - that of Ann Marie Shirran, a second missing woman in the St. John’s area raised alarm bells with many.

The day after she returned home, the police held a news conference to simply say they wouldn’t be saying anything more about the disappearance.

They said there was nothing criminal about her disappearance, and therefore they would respect the family’s privacy.

Personally, I was a bit ticked off at that explanation at first. Reports of her return said she stumbled onto her street exhausted and dehydrated. What was up with that?

Some online comments said Ms. Goodyear and her family owe the public an explanation. After all, the family turned to the public through the media when she first went missing.

So if one turns to the media in a time of need, does one necessarily owe something to the media once the problem has been resolved?

The more I thought about it, the more I realized the answer is no.

The case of Ms. Goodyear has many parallels with case of a New Brunswick woman with ties to the southwest coast from earlier in the year. In both cases a woman went missing and an immediate outcry from her family caught the media’s attention.

In both cases, the woman’s name and picture was widely publicized.

In the case of the New Brunswick woman, the truth came out that she had been held captive. Just days after her escape, a judge ordered a publication ban on her name.

Will her privacy be protected by the ban? Not really. The details of the case against the accused will come out, and everyone will remember exactly who the victim was and where she was from.

The case of Samantha Goodyear is sort of the opposite. While her name will also remain in people’s minds, the details of her disappearance will likely never be known by most, nor do we need to know.

Using the media in a missing persons case may be effective, but it comes with the price of a certain fame, or at least a loss of privacy. What matters in both cases is that the women were found alive and relatively unharmed. The public should be satisfied with that.

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Gulf News is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Gulf News Twitter

Advertising